“thus the world we see and experience full of objects with parts is a product of human misperception”

So I guess you’re right: we’re seeing stuff that isn’t really there.

I thought this was humorous (Eris being the deity in their mock religion):

GREATER POOP: Is Eris true?
MALACLYPSE THE YOUNGER: Everything is true.
GP: Even false things?
M2: Even false things are true.
GP: How can that be?
M2: I don’t know man, I didn’t do it.

Maybe, I did not express myself clearly. If my thoughts are different from God’s thoughts, I am obviously in a state of conflict. Not because of what God thinks, but because of what I think. Yet that implies already that there can be anything other than God. How could that be? Only in my separate mind, which is not a real possibility.

What about reality?

It is true that any ideas you have of things ‘existing’ beyond, above, and outside of yourself are merely ideas.

Whatever you make of them, your senses and your thoughts are the inescapable “reality”.

Would you say, God’s thoughts are not different from mine? If they are different, then I would have to call my thoughts hallucinations, no matter if they appear to me as images or not.

I don’t get how you can make that inference. Maybe it’s a semantic misunderstanding by me.

Calling it a hallucination in no way changes the nature of the ‘reality’ I mentioned above.

Hallucination is a word most people use to describe sensory input without external stimuli (i.e. as experienced by psychotics and schizophrenics).

Maybe you’ll find this interesting.

What is your starting point? Do you start with a single source of reality?

Doesn’t reality unfold itself?

‘Myself’ is another mental concoction. What makes you believe that your sense of self is not yet another hallucination?

“With what frame of mind should one discipline oneself in the truth?”
Said the Zen master, “There is no mind to be framed, nor is there any truth in which to be disciplined.”
“If there is no mind to be framed and no truth in which to be disciplined, why do you have a daily gathering of monks who are studying Zen and disciplining themselves in the truth?”
The master replied: “I have not an inch of space to spare, and where
could I have a gathering of monks?
I have no tongue, and how would it be possible for me to advise others to come to me?”
The philosopher then exclaimed, “How can you tell a lie like that to my face.”
“When I have no tongue to advise others, is it possible for me to tell a lie?”
Said Doko despairingly, “I cannot follow your reasoning.”
“Neither do I understand myself,” concluded the Zen master.

The one (in italics) at the top of this page is also worth reading.

A Course In Miracles teaches, my thoughts are images i have made. I see my thoughts as images. I am an image maker. That does not represent reality.

Would you say, God’s thoughts are not different from mine? If they are different, then I would have to call my thoughts hallucinations, no matter if they appear to me as images or not.
It all depends on the possibility of this world. If it is possible, and therefore true and real, then I rest my case. What is your starting point? Do you start with a single source of reality?

The first paragraph is enough to get an idea of it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism

And this is also interesting (I’m linking to a sub-section).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum#Criticisms_of_the_cogito

So, “there are thoughts”. Don’t think you can say, ‘there are hallucinations’ (because the differentiation between ‘thoughts’ and ‘hallucinations’ is yet another thought.

Entirely possible since all reality is a figment of my own imagination.